Attorney Dean Andrews spent much of the weekend of the Kennedy assassination in a state of delirium induced by pneumonia, fever, medication, and oxygen. His physician told the FBI that Andrews had spent the entire weekend "under heavy sedation," so much so that he had trouble believing the patient had even been "capable of using the telephone during that time."
On the afternoon of
Saturday, November 23, 1963, Andrews was awakened by a phone call from an old friend, Eugene C. Davis, who operated a bar in the French Quarter. Andrews had represented in a handful of minor legal matters over the years, and Davis occasionally sent him clients from the gay community. On November 23rd, he wanted Andrews's assistance with the sale of an automobile. Davis
The conversation inevitably turned to the hot topic of the day, the assassination of President Kennedy, about which Andrews was keeping abreast via the television set in his hospital room. "Man," he mused to
, "I would be famous if I could go to Davis and defend Lee Harvey Oswald. Whoever gets that job is going to be a famous lawyer." Dallas
Probably just moments after saying goodbye to
, Dean Andrews embarked upon the series of phone calls that would change his life, albeit not for the better. He phoned his secretary, Eva Springer, and told her he had been retained to defend the accused assassin. Who had hired him? she very reasonably wanted to know. Davis
Of course, no one had. There was only his phone conversation with Gene Davis. This gave him an idea, however.
Some years earlier, Andrews had attended a party in the Rendezvous Bar, where Gene Davis was bartender. A co-worker of Davis's, Helen Girt, known as "Big Jo," pointed to
and jokingly announced, "Meet Clay Bertrand." Davis
Bertrand, Andrews found himself saying to Eva Springer. Bertrand hired me. 
Perhaps one would have to be familiar with Dean Andrews and his penchant for tall tales, described by one friend as "flights of fancy" and "soaring adventures in imagination," in order to understand this course of action. There is also the attorney's illness to consider: the pneumonia, the fever. There were the treatments he was receiving: the oxygen, the medication, the sedatives. And there was the television in his hospital room, emanating constant reminders of the sensational events underway in
, events in which Dean Andrews could only dream about participating. Dallas
"Don't forget I [was] in the hospital sick," the attorney would try to explain later. When he made the phone calls about going to
, he said, "I might have believed it myself." Dallas
After Oswald was murdered, Andrews began to concoct another story -- that the President's accused assassin had been his client the previous summer. He got all the information he needed from the television in his hospital room. And with Oswald dead, who could deny it?
As the attorney later testified at the trial of Clay Shaw, once his pneumonia had passed and he was no longer feverish and under the influence of drugs, he had a difficult time reconstructing the events of the assassination weekend. Early in December he admitted "this entire incident could have been dreamed by him in view of the physical condition he was in at the time."
He later chose to resurrect "Clay Bertrand" for the Warren Commission, once "Bertrand's" existence could no longer cause him any trouble . . . or so he thought.
When Orleans Parish District Attorney Jim Garrison opened his investigation into Oswald's
activities, Dean Andrews's Warren Commission testimony became a focal point, though still secondary in the DA's mind to prime suspect David Ferrie. In January 1967, LIFE editor Richard Billings, who was working closely with Garrison, asked the DA if he knew the identity of the mysterious Clay Bertrand. Bertrand "may not exist," Garrison said, but he "may be Clay Shaw." New Orleans
Clay Shaw was a prominent and well-respected
businessman and civic leader. He was a pioneer in the restoration of historic New Orleans sites, a playwright, a patron of the arts, and one of the founders of the city's International Trade Mart, later renamed the New Orleans . But while Dean Andrews had described "Bertrand" as "a youthful appearing person age 22-23," somewhere from 5'7" to 6'2", 160 to 175 pounds, with hair that was either blonde, sandy or brown; Clay Shaw was fifty years old in 1963, stood fully 6'4", weighed 225 pounds, and had hair that was almost pure white. World Trade Center
A lifelong registered Democrat and self-described liberal in the tradition of Woodrow Wilson and FDR, Shaw supported John F. Kennedy's 1960 run for the presidency and considered JFK "a splendid president" for his "youth, imagination, style and elan" as well as his political programs. "If there was one person in
who believed in John F. Kennedy," one friend said, "it was Clay Shaw." New Orleans
How had Jim Garrison decided Clay Shaw was Bertrand?
"One, Bertrand is homosexual," Garrison told members of his staff in December 1966. "Two, Bertrand speaks Spanish. Three, his first name is Clay." Shaw fit these criteria therefore Shaw was Bertrand.
The DA and his assistants questioned Shaw, who said he had never met Lee Oswald. Garrison seemed impressed with the man and told his staff to "forget Shaw." But when Garrison's prime suspect, David Ferrie, died on
February 22, 1967, the DA was faced with the prospect of either admitting he had nothing else to go on or finding another suspect immediately. Clay Shaw was under arrest for conspiracy to assassinate the President just a week later.
Garrison called upon Dean Andrews to help him make a case against Clay Shaw. The DA and the attorney were old friends, having been in law school together. Garrison told Andrews they would "ride to glory together" if Andrews would identify Clay Shaw as Clay Bertrand.
Andrews, who had become an assistant DA in neighboring Jefferson Parish, initially saw no reason to let on that his Warren Commission testimony had been a fiction, but he repeatedly denied that Clay Shaw was "in any way, shape or form, Clay Bertrand." He had never met Clay Shaw in his life, Andrews said. Finally, as it became clear he could not dissuade the DA from his conviction that Shaw and Bertrand were one and the same, Andrews informed Garrison that he had made the whole story up.
Andrews made one slip, however. When Garrison asked him if he knew David Ferrie, Andrews said that he did; that he had once arranged a parole for a friend of Ferrie's. He acknowledged that this had not been "a strictly legal move for an assistant DA to make." He never imagined his old pal Jim would use the information against him.
Finally, according to Andrews, the DA offered him a deal. Since no one in
but Dean Andrews had ever heard of Clay Bertrand, Andrews was the only person who could confirm or deny Bertrand's identity. The attorney therefore had a choice, Garrison informed him. He could face an indictment for the parole action he had so freely admitted, or he could play ball. This meant Andrews would neither confirm nor deny that Shaw was Bertrand. Andrews agreed. New Orleans
Called before the Grand Jury, Andrews kept his end of the bargain. Was Clay Shaw Clay Bertrand? "I can't say he is and I can't say he ain't," the attorney responded.
Jim Garrison charged Dean Andrews with perjury. A conviction followed. Andrews lost his position as Assistant DA of Jefferson Parish. He was subsequently disbarred.
Dean Andrews had had enough. "I kept my deal with the Big Giant," Andrews said, referring to the 6'6" District Attorney. "I told him, I [would] say, I can't say yes and I can't say no. And I stuck to it. And I got indicted for it."
The attorney admitted that "he had made up the name Clay Bertrand 'out of solid air' to protect a friend" -- the owner of a gay bar in the French Quarter. The man's name, he revealed, was Eugene C. Davis.
heatedly denied being "Clay Bertrand" or having ever met Lee Oswald. Called again before the Grand Jury, Andrews tried to explain. Davis
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAMES ALCOCK. Dean, do you know who the real Clay . . .
ANDREWS. The man, I believe, is Gene Davis, and if you ask him, he'll call me a crocosack [sic] of lies . . .
ALCOCK. What basis do you have [for that belief]?
ANDREWS. Helen Girt, back in the Fifties, at the fag wedding reception I was telling you all about, introduced [
to me] as Clay Bertrand. Davis
ALCOCK. . . . Have you talked to this man on the phone recently?
ANDREWS. I have talked to him almost every day. I have known him a long time.
ALCOCK. Your testimony now is that this is the man who sent the clients to your office? Talked to you on behalf of homosexuals?
ANDREWS. This is the man who sent clients to my office; sometimes they were fags, sometimes they weren't.
ALCOCK. Is this the man who called you in the hospital and asked you to represent Lee Harvey Oswald?
ANDREWS. This is the man I believed called me . . . what you all believe is your affair.
A JUROR. In your mind, this is Clay Bertrand? The man who called you down through the years representing homosexuals?
ANDREWS. No, he didn't do it that way. That's the way I said it, put it into the Warren Commission Report -- everybody picks it up from there and goes with it. . . .
ASSISTANT DA RICHARD V. BURNES. I asked you if you ever heard from Clay Bertrand after the time you were called about representing Lee Oswald in the assassination, and the answer was, "I ain't seen hide nor hair of him since."
ANDREWS. Not from Clay Bertrand, 'cause I call him Gene Davis. You are right. I told you that, and I ain't seen hide nor hair of him nor heard from Clay Bertrand . . . I call him Gene. I was introduced to the man ["Bertrand"] one time.
"If [Garrison's] case is based on the fact that Clay L. Shaw is Clay Bertrand," Andrews continued, "it's a joke." "I may have said a thousand times one thing, but the one time I say Clay Shaw ain't Clay Bertrand clears me of all the rest. . . . It doesn't make any difference to me if I'm convicted. . . . Clay Shaw is not Clay Bertrand. Indict me if you want to."
They did. James Alcock summed up the state's position when he declared it was "obvious that this man won't tell the world the truth on the matter." Andrews's response was unequivocal: "So I lied. I committed perjury. I don't know what I said. The man is Eugene Davis."
At the 1969 trial of Clay Shaw, Andrews persisted in the unchallenged claim that Lee Harvey Oswald had briefly been a client of his, but he came clean about "Clay Bertrand."
JAMES ALCOCK. Do you know a person named Clay Bertrand?
ANDREWS. I know a person who back in the early Fifties was introduced to me as Clay Bertrand.
ALCOCK. And what was the occasion of this introduction?
ANDREWS. I walked into the Rendezvous Bar. It was in the afternoon, I don't recall the date, and they had a wedding reception going on in the dance part in the rear.
ALCOCK. Do you recall by whom you were introduced to Clay Bertrand?
ANDREWS. Big Jo . . . Helen Girt.
ALCOCK. . . . Had you known this individual [you were introduced to] prior to going to the wedding reception?
ANDREWS. Yes. 
ALCOCK. . . . Would you say you saw him regularly after this wedding reception?
ANDREWS. Well, not regularly, but we would bump into each other, and I handled some legal matters for him.
ALCOCK. To your knowledge, did he ever call you and ask you to represent anyone after the wedding reception?
ANDREWS. He would refer clients to the office.
ALCOCK. Then I take it when you were interviewed by [FBI agent Regis] Kennedy in the hospital, you knew who you were talking about allegedly when you told them the name Clay Bertrand? Is that correct?
ANDREWS. . . . At the time Regis Kennedy was making his examination, it suddenly dawned on me that if I revealed the real name I would bring a lot of heat and a lot of trouble to somebody that it didn't belong to. Now this is my recollection, best as I can. I fumbled around for a cover name, and I happened to remember being introduced to this boy, party by the name Clay Bertrand, and used the name Clay Bertrand to associate in my mind with the real party that called. That is the best I can recall.
ALCOCK. . . . Now, did you know that the FBI was looking for this Clay Bertrand?
ANDREWS. I vaguely recall Mr. Kennedy coming into the hospital and telling me about a bunch of men that were in the field, and it was my decision whether they should stay in the field or come out of the field. I don't recall [what] I told him, but it was to this effect: I can't help you, pull them up and [send] them someplace else. So in that way I would have to answer yes.
ALCOCK. . . . Was it as a result of this phone call that you called Mr. Zelden? . . . The phone call you got from Clay Bertrand in the hospital.
ANDREWS. I have never received a phone call from Clay Bertrand in the hospital.
ALCOCK. Well, the individual that you say is Clay Bertrand.
ANDREWS. When did I say this man was Clay Bertrand? I don't recall that.
ALCOCK. Well, you testified before the Warren Commission didn't you?
ALCOCK. Under oath, wasn't it?
ALCOCK. . . . Did you know [the caller] by any other name than Clay Bertrand?
ANDREWS. Gene Davis. 
ALCOCK. . . . Did you have occasion during this period right after you met the man you identify as Clay Bertrand, to see him very often?
ANDREWS. I have never identified Gene Davis, to my knowledge, as Clay Bertrand. I have used the words, "Clay Bertrand." as a cover to mentioning Gene Davis. I have never identified him as Clay Bertrand, to my knowledge.
ALCOCK. . . . Is there any reason why you didn't tell the FBI when they were seeking the identity of the man you said was Clay Bertrand?
ANDREWS. At the time I was under the influence of opiates and sedation. I did not have any knowledge they were seeking Clay Bertrand until maybe three, four days later, if I was aware of it then.
ALCOCK. . . . Can you recall the last time you had seen this man that you identify as Clay Bertrand prior to going into the hospital?
ANDREWS. I never have identified anybody as Clay Bertrand; I have used Clay Bertrand as a cover name for Gene Davis.
ALCOCK. All right. Well, Gene Davis. When was the last time you saw Gene Davis prior to going into the hospital in November of 1963?
ANDREWS. I would have to guess. About two weeks before I went into the hospital.
ALCOCK. So then when you told the Warren Commission under oath that you hadn't seen him in six months, you were telling a lie?
ANDREWS. . . . At the time Mr. Liebeler was questioning me, it is just as it is in the courtroom, rapid fire. It was an informal meeting; I didn't place to much importance to why an insignificant person like myself would even be called. I answered the best I could at that time. I didn't deliberately lie, I might have overloaded my mouth with the importance of being a witness in the front of the Warren [Commission], but other than that I didn't deliberately lie. I think the only explanation I can give you is that my mouth went ahead of my brain.
ALCOCK. Do you recall telling Mr. Liebeler that you saw Clay Bertrand six weeks prior to the time that he questioned you?
ANDREWS. Well, I figured that wasn't material. You can call it a lie if you want; I call it huffing and puffing.
ALCOCK. Huffing and puffing under oath?
ANDREWS. Bull session.
ALCOCK. . . . You testified earlier that Mr. Kennedy had attempted to locate this Clay Bertrand, is that correct, as a result of the conversation with you?
ANDREWS. This is what I gathered. I was still under sedation, still using oxygen then I believe. This is vague, way off in the distance. He appeared before me like a myth. I remember answering questions, I don't remember what they were. . . . [T]he only thing that I can recall is could I give him any better information, and I told him, no, call your man up, do whatever you want. If you want to think that I am a squirrel or I am not, be my guest, I cannot help you.
ALCOCK. And you didn't choose to help the FBI on that occasion by giving them the name of Gene Davis?
ANDREWS. I didn't choose to implicate an innocent man, Gene Davis, in something [where] I couldn't even recall what I said . . . [A]ll of a sudden it dawned on me that as result of my calling those people I could involve an innocent party into a whole lot of humbug. At that time in the hospital under sedation I elected a course that I have never been able to get away from. . . .
ALCOCK. You say an innocent man. This man called you on behalf of Lee Harvey Oswald?
ANDREWS. No, it didn't go like that. I don't recall what I told Regis Kennedy, but I know, I am positive that that was not the purpose of the phone call. I sat back -- and I have many a time [tried] to reconstruct -- the best that I can reconstruct was that Gene Davis called me to pass an act of sale for two of the kids while I was in the hospital . . . I told him that I was sick in the hospital, if he could get my seal out of the office I would pass the act there. Naturally [the Kennedy assassination] was an important thing to everybody. I don't know whether I suggested, "Man, I would be famous if I could go to
and defend Lee Harvey Oswald, whoever gets that job is going to be a famous lawyer," or whether in a conversation it came about. Nobody said it per se as everybody believed. . . . Dallas
ALCOCK. Do you mean to tell me this time you are now telling this Court under oath that no one called you on behalf of the representation of Lee Harvey Oswald in
ANDREWS. Per se my answer is yes, no one called me to say that. The phone call I received was a local call from Gene Davis involving two people who were going to sell an automobile and they wanted the title notarized and a bill of sale notarized. . . . That is an act of sale, a movable passing from one person to another.
ALCOCK. Why is it you called Monk Zelden on Sunday then and asked if he wanted to go to
ANDREWS. No explanation. Don't forget I am in the hospital sick, I might have believed it myself or thought after a while I was retained there, so I called Monk. I would like to be famous too, other than as a perjurer.
ALCOCK. That is going to be difficult.
ANDREWS. C'est la vie. . . .
THE COURT. . . . Mr. Alcock, would you permit me to ask the witness one more thing? I don't know whether I understood you correctly or not, but when I asked you why did you create the name Bertrand or Clay Bertrand, did you tell me you met someone at a wedding by the name of Bertrand?
ANDREWS. . . . No, I stated that I was introduced to a person who I knew already to be Gene Davis, in a very casual manner, people half loaded eating free sandwiches and getting all the free booze. I got there in the middle of the thing and Big Jo says, "Meet Clay Bertrand," just like that, "everybody." I burst out laughing, I knew the cat -- I mean I knew the guy, Gene Davis.
THE COURT. But the girl, Big Jo, she used the name Clay Bertrand? That is where you got that word?
ANDREWS. Right. . . .
THE COURT. Who did Big Jo point to when she said, "Meet Clay Bertrand"?
ANDREWS. Gene Davis.
ALCOCK. The party Gene Davis, when he called you on the occasion in November did he identify himself as Clay Bertrand?
ANDREWS. No, he has never used that name; I have never known him by that name.
ALCOCK. But you were introduced to him [sic] by that name?
ANDREWS. That doesn't mean I know him [by that name]. I knew who he was, Gene Davis. I have been introduced as Algonquin J. Calhoun but people know me as Dean Andrews, know it is not my name.
THE COURT. . . . Did
ever call you on behalf of Oswald on any other occasion? Davis
ANDREWS. No, never called me on behalf of Oswald -- period.
THE COURT. Who was guaranteeing Oswald's fee in that case?
ANDREWS. I never had any commission, retainer, or anything. That is bull.
THE COURT. That is more bull?
While Jim Garrison's conspiracy case against Clay Shaw did not ultimately hinge upon Shaw's alleged use of an alias, it was common knowledge that suspicion had originally fallen upon Shaw solely because of Dean Andrews's "Bertrand" tales and the fact that the District Attorney thought Clay Shaw fit the description of "Clay Bertrand." When Andrews finally made it clear that there was not and had never been a "Clay Bertrand," Judge Edward Haggerty was reportedly so shaken by the news that he privately suggested to the DA's men (as the DA himself was not present in court) that "perhaps they should make a reassessment of their position in this case." This, the DA's men reportedly responded, they lacked the authority to do.
A curious side note to the "Bertrand" affair concerns a document from the files of the New Orleans Police Department.
When Clay Shaw was arrested, he was booked and fingerprinted by Officer Aloysius Habighorst of the NOPD. Seventeen months later, Habighorst informed the District Attorney that when he had routinely asked Shaw for any aliases he may have used, Shaw had responded, "Clay Bertrand." Habighorst produced the card, upon which the officer had typed that name.
Shaw adamantly denied saying any such thing. He insisted under oath at trial that Habighorst had not questioned him at all during the booking procedure and that the form had been blank when he signed it. He testified that Officer Habighorst had informed him he had to sign the card if he expected to be allowed to post bail.
James Kirkwood's book American Grotesque has a detailed account of the testimony about Shaw's booking and supposed admission of the use of the "Clay Bertrand" alias.
A full day of the trial was expended upon hearing testimony about the suspect arrest record. Sworn testimony confirmed that it was standard operating procedure for the NOPD to ask the suspect to sign the arrest record while it was still blank, then fingerprint him, then fill out the form last. At that time, the booking officer would have the suspect's field arrest report, containing all the necessary information.
The most significant testimony came from Sgt. Jonas J. Butzman, who had been assigned by Captain Louis Curole to guard Clay Shaw throughout the booking procedure. Butzman testified that he had complied with this assignment, staying within "about five or ten feet" of Shaw the entire time he was being booked.
Contrary to Officer Habighorst's testimony, Butzman stated that Habighorst had not asked Shaw any of the questions on the arrest record. He specifically denied that Shaw had been questioned about aliases, and insisted he did not hear the name Clay Bertrand mentioned.
Clay Shaw later told Penthouse magazine that "if there was anyone in
who would have difficulty using an alias, it would be me. . . . For about seventeen or eighteen years I had been managing director of the International Trade Mart here and in that capacity I was in the public eye a great deal. I was on television quite often and my picture had been in the local papers. I attended many civic affairs, luncheons, meetings. In addition, I'm a highly recognizable fellow. I'm rather outsized -- six feet four inches tall -- and I have a shock of prematurely gray hair that is almost white. In a town of this size, where I had made perhaps five hundred speeches and knew literally thousands of people, the idea that I would go around here trying to use an alias is utterly fantastic." New Orleans
In Jim Garrison's memoir, On the Trail of the Assassins, the former DA claims that "everyone" in the French Quarter knew Shaw was "Bertrand." Nevertheless, in the two years between Shaw's arrest and trial, Garrison was unable, even with the power of subpoena, to produce so much as a single witness to confirm "Clay Bertrand's" identity. To this day, not a single credible witness has ever emerged to link Shaw to that name.
Of course, even if Shaw had been "Bertrand," the most incriminating act ever ascribed to that mysterious individual by Dean Andrews was nothing more than a purported phone call to obtain legal counsel for Lee Harvey Oswald. Nevertheless, this was the keystone upon which Jim Garrison's entire prosecution of Clay Shaw was erected.
Next: Clay Shaw: Assassin or Fall Guy?
Part 1: Meet Clay Bertrand. It all started with a shadowy (and possibly non-existent) figure named "Clay Bertrand" mentioned to the Warren Commission by Dean Andrews.
Part 2: Who Was Clay Bertrand? Was there really a "Clay Bertrand," and did he have any connection to Clay Shaw?
Part 3: Clay Shaw: Assassin or Fall Guy? Jim Garrison attempts to link Shaw to an assassination conspiracy.
Part 4: A Question of Perjury. Garrison supporters, unable to show that Shaw conspired to kill Kennedy, often fall back to the claim that "he lied under oath." Is this true?
Back to JFK Features
Back to Jim Garrison menu
Back to JFK menu
Dave Reitzes home page
 FBI report of interview with J. D. Andrews,
December 5, 1963, Warren Commission Exhibit No. 2899, Warren Commission Hearings, Vol. XXVI, p. 355.
 Transcript, State of Louisiana v. Clay Shaw, hereafter Shaw,
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 129-32. See also Milton E. Brener, The Garrison Case (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1969), pp. 58-9, 259; Patricia Lambert, False Witness (New York: M. Evans and Co., 1998), pp. 31, 121 fn., 149-51, 155 fn.; Tom Bethell diary, August 19, 1967, October 2, 1967.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 131; Lambert, pp. 31-32. See also FBI interview of Dean Andrews, December 5, 1963; Lambert, p. 297 fn. 32.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 148; Lambert, p. 151.
 FBI report of interview with Eva Springer, December 5, 1963; Warren Commission Exhibit No. 2901, Warren Commission Hearings, Vol. XXVI, p. 357.
 Lambert, p. 32. See also Shaw,
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 132-3; Brener, pp. 58-9.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 130-2; Lambert, p. 150.
 FBI interviews with Dean Andrews, December 3 and December 5, 1963; Secret Service interview with Dean Andrews, December 6, 1963; Lambert, pp. 33-4.
 Lambert, p. 34. This is borne out by statements of Andrews's that are in conflict with Oswald's biography. For example, Andrews claimed that Oswald approached him about obtaining
citizenship for his wife, Marina; but during the spring and summer of 1963, Oswald was taking steps to have his wife returned to the US . (Warren Commission Report, pp. 725, 727.) USSR
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 130-2; Lambert, p. 150.
 FBI interview of Dean Andrews,
December 3, 1963.
 Richard Billings, "Dick Billings's personal notes on consultations and interviews with Garrison,"
January 22, 1967(p. 6).
 Lambert, p. 49.
 Edward Jay Epstein, The Assassination Chronicles (New York: Carroll and Graf, 1992), pp. 196-97; Lambert, p. 47.
 Lambert, p. 166 fn.
 Epstein, p. 197.
 Lambert, p. 74.
 Epstein, p. 228.
 Lambert, p. 50.
 Lambert, p. 50; Epstein, p. 229.
 Lambert, p. 50; Epstein, p. 227.
 Lambert, p. 50; Epstein, p. 227-29. When Andrews testified before the grand jury, the witness who followed him was Thomas Clark, the young man whose parole Andrews had arranged.
 Lambert, p. 50; Epstein, p. 229.
 Epstein, pp. 229-31; Lambert, pp. 120-22. The conviction was eventually reversed. (Lambert, p. 176.) Jim Garrison would later claim that he himself dismissed the charges against Dean Andrews, (Garrison, On the Trail of the Assassins [New York: Warner Books, 1992], p. 284 fn.) but he had left office before the conviction was overturned by Judge Frank J. Shea in 1974. (Lambert, p. 285.)
 Epstein, p. 196 fn. Sticking to his tale of being Oswald's lawyer, however, Andrews claimed that this bar owner had sent Oswald to him. He would admit at the Shaw trial that this was not true.
 Grand Jury Testimony of Dean A. Andrews, Jr., June 28, 1967; Lambert, pp. 116, 312 fn. 24.
 NODA Affidavit of Eugene C. Davis,
June 28, 1967; Flammonde, The Kennedy Conspiracy (New York: Meredith Press, 1969), pp. 56-57. See also Grand Jury Testimony of Eugene C. Davis (Gene Davis), June 28, 1967; Lambert, p. 121. Paris
 Grand Jury Testimony of Dean A. Andrews, Jr., June 28, 1967; Flammonde, pp. 58-59; Lambert, pp. 120-21.
 Grand Jury Testimony of Dean A. Andrews, Jr., June 28, 1967; Flammonde, pp. 65-66; Lambert, pp. 120-21.
 Flammonde, p. 66.
 Flammonde, p. 67.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 52-55; Lambert, p. 150.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 58; Lambert, p. 150.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 59; Lambert, pp. 149-50.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 60; Lambert, pp. 149-50.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 61; Lambert, pp. 149-50.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 62-63; Lambert, pp. 149-50.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 123; Lambert, pp. 149-50.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 124.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 126.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 126-28; Lambert, p. 150.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 129-30; Lambert, pp. 149-51.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 130-32; Lambert, p. 150.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 130-2; Lambert, p. 150.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 147; Lambert, p. 151.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 148; Lambert, p. 151.
February 25, 1969, (2038) p. 149; Lambert, p. 151.
February 25, 1969, (2038) pp. 149-50; Lambert, p. 145.
 James Kirkwood, American Grotesque (New York: Harper Perennial, 1970), p. 395.
February 19, 1969, (2029) pp. 53-59; Lambert, p. 145.
February 19, 1969, (2029) pp. 167-68; Lambert, p. 145.
 Garrison would later falsely claim that Judge Haggerty interfered with the prosecution's case at this point, a charge uncritically adopted by Oliver Stone.
February 19, 1969, (2029), pp. 122-30.
February 19, 1969, (2029), pp. 109-11. Even longtime Garrison friend and advocate Mark Lanehas remarked on the implausibility of the notion that Shaw would so willingly divulge such an alias. ( Mark Lane, "Fact or Fiction? The Moviegoer's Guide to the Film JFK," Rush to Judgment [ : Thunder's Mouth, 1992], p. xxxii.) It is also difficult to understand why Shaw would so eagerly divulge this most significant alleged alias while failing to mention the pseudonym under which he was a published playwright: "Allen White." (Flammonde, p. 73; Shaw, February 27, 1969,  p. 23; Lambert, p. 153.) New York
At trial, the prosecution also offered into evidence a page from the guest register of the Eastern Airlines VIP Room, with the name "Clay Bertrand" signed at the very bottom. Prosecution witness Mrs. Jessie Parker testified that she had been working at the Eastern Airlines VIP Room in
on New Orleans December 14, 1966, when she saw a man she identified as Clay Shaw sign the guest register. Mrs. Parker testified that Shaw had been accompanied by one individual, about whom she could recall nothing. (Brener, p. 256; Lambert, p. 145.) Clay Shaw testified that he was not in the Eastern Airlines VIP Room at this time, did not ever use the Eastern Airlines VIP Room, was not aware there was such a room at the airport, and had not himself flown with a commercial airline in many years. (Shaw, February 27, 1969,  pp. 20-21; Brener, p. 261; Lambert, p. 153.)
The defense called handwriting analyst Charles Appel, Jr., who displayed blow-ups of Shaw's signature and the "Bertrand" signature to the jury. He testified that the "Bertrand" signature had been written "by some other writer entirely," pointing out numerous features of the handwriting upon which he based his analysis. (Shaw, February 25, 1969, (2039), pp. 15-32; Lambert, pp. 151-52.)
During cross-examination, Mrs. Parker revealed that she had initially refused to identify Shaw as the man from the VIP Room. (James Kirkwood, American Grotesque [New York: Harper Perennial, 1970], p. 349.) Her initial affidavit of
September 12, 1967, also reveals that her story underwent some significant changes prior to her testimony. Originally she stated that the VIP Room patron in question had been accompanied by not one undistinguished man, but by "four persons from and one other individual." (William Davy, Let Justice Be Done [Reston, Va.: Jordan, 1999], p. 178.) Garrison's office subsequently identified the five men who had paid a visit to the VIP Room on Caracas, Venezuela December 14, 1966. They were Henry C. Spicer, a retired Navy captain and Managing Director of International Relations of the International House and Executive Director of the Foreign Relations Association of New Orleans, and four members of the Venezuelan government and military. (Davy, p. 180. The identity of the men was originally suggested by a December 15, 1966, Times-Picayune article, and confirmed by the NODA on New Orleans January 10, 1969.) Bill Davy reports, "On January 10, 1969, a representative of Garrison's office visited with Captain Spicer. Spicer allowed the DA's man to view his scrapbook of activities he kept as Director of International Relations." The scrapbook included a photograph of Spicer with his four Venezuelan visitors. A Grand Jury subpoena was issued for Spicer on January 14, 1969, but Spicer did not testify. "It is unknown what subsequently transpired," Bill Davy writes, "but Assistant DA Alcock interviewed Spicer and was apparently convinced he could add nothing more to the case and directed Spicer to ignore the subpoena." (Davy, p. 180.)
The day after Charles Appel testified for the defense, the prosecution brought forth one Elizabeth McCarthy, a handwriting analyst flown in at the last minute from
. McCarthy declared it was "highly probable" that the "Clay Bertrand" signature on the guest register was the handiwork of Clay Shaw, offering vague stylistic criteria she had identified with the aid of a pair of binoculars. (Shaw, February 28, 1969, , pp. 83-90.) During the prosecution's closing remarks, Assistant DA James Alcock expressed his doubt that Shaw would sign the name "Clay Bertrand" in his usual handwriting anyway. (Shaw, February 28, 1969,  p. 161.) Boston
The prosecution also offered mail carrier, James Hardiman, who claimed to have delivered roughly half a dozen letters to "Clem Bertrand" at the residence of Shaw's friend James Biddison, where Shaw received mail at times. Hardiman said that none of these letters were returned as being wrongly addressed. This allegation is based solely on his memory of the name "Clem Bertrand." (Shaw, February 13, 1969,  pp. 4-8; Lambert, p. 139.) When Hardiman was cross-examined, attorney Irvin Dymond asked him if he had ever delivered mail to a Mr. Cliff Bordreaux at this same address. Hardiman stated that he had, and continued to insist upon this even after Dymond revealed that he had invented the name himself. Author James Kirkwood "later learned that Hardiman may have been in touch with the District Attorney's office regarding other matters between the time of the preliminary hearing and this current trial. Hardiman's son, Terry Gerard Hardiman, 20 years old, had been arrested in April of 1968 on a theft charge. As of March 1970, no action on the boy's case appeared to have been taken by the District Attorney's office." (Kirkwood, p. 308.)
 Garrison, pp. 98-99. In 1967, Garrison advocate Joachim Joesten wrote, "It is not known yet who or what provided the original clue to Garrison's investigators for thinking that Clay Bertrand was an alias used by one of New Orleans' most prominent citizens who real name was Clay L. Shaw." (Joachim Joesten, The Garrison Enquiry [London: Hills and Lacy Ltd., 1967], p. 49.) Two decades later, researcher Scott Van Wynsberghe wrote that "pro-Garrison sources are peculiarly silent over the exact mechanism by which 'Clay Bertrand' became 'Clay Shaw.'" (Scott Van Wynsberghe, "Dead Suspects, Part VI," The Third Decade, May 1988, p. 4.) Garrison's 1988 memoir marked the first time the former DA ever publicly advanced any explanation at all for the means with which he purportedly identified Shaw as "Bertrand." In On the Trail of the Assassins, Garrison claims that "everyone" in the French Quarter knew that Clay Shaw was "Bertrand," but no one was willing to testify to that effect. (The DA apparently was too softhearted to compel anyone to do so.) He then cites two specific witnesses. One is Mrs. Jessie Parker (see endnote #57). The other is William Morris, a convicted felon interviewed in prison on
July 14, 1967-- two weeks after Dean Andrews announced publicly that he'd used "Clay Bertrand" as a cover name for Eugene C. Davis. Morris claimed that in 1958, Eugene C. Davis introduced him to a Clay Bertrand, who paid him twenty dollars for sex. Morris had seen Shaw on television and identified him as Bertrand. Morris also claimed that Shaw once visited his home in the company of a man who resembled Jack Ruby. Gene Davis had already testified under oath to the Grand Jury that he had never spoken to Clay Shaw in his life, and he would testify to this again at Shaw's trial. Jim Garrison did not challenge him. William Morris was not called to testify; in fact, the District Attorney's office never acknowledged Morris as a viable witness.
Back to JFK Features
Back to Jim Garrison menu
Back to JFK menu
Dave Reitzes home page