The JFK 100

What exactly are the facts about this car trip, and why did Jim Garrison consider it so important?

As depicted in JFK, information about the trip came to the DA's office from a Ferrie associate named Jack S. Martin. When the tip was called to Jim Garrison's attention in 1963, he did not know that Martin was the source. Had he known, he might well have disregarded the information, as he knew the tipster well: not only as "a liar who hates Ferrie," as Garrison would describe him three years later, but also as the crackpot who had, only months earlier, filed (and then hastily withdrawn) a frivolous lawsuit against none other than Jim Garrison, for "conspiracy to harass, molest, intimidate, and persecute" him.⁽²⁾

Martin had heard from a mutual acquaintance that Ferrie and two friends had left Louisiana by car on the evening of the assassination.⁽³⁾ Because of this and other allegations Martin made about Ferrie, Garrison ordered the trip investigated thoroughly.

With the cooperation of police in Louisiana and Texas, the FBI, and even the Texas Rangers, the trip was exhaustively documented and scrutinized. Investigators talked to Ferrie and his friends, interviewed witnesses, and pored over hotel guest registers and phone records. Nothing came of it; the trip had absolutely nothing to do with the assassination.

As a private investigator for New Orleans attorney G. Wray Gill, Ferrie had worked nearly every day in November 1963. Gill was representing Mob boss Carlos Marcello, whom the federal government was trying to deport. Ferrie and his friends had planned to take a few days off as soon as Marcello's deportation hearing concluded; this occurred on November 22. Ferrie spent the afternoon celebrating Marcello's court victory with others from Gill's office, then took off for the weekend with his friends.⁽⁴⁾

Al Beauboeuf told researcher A. J. Weberman, "The trip to Texas had been planned two weeks in advance. It all rolled out. The [Marcello] trial finished up and we just went."⁽⁵⁾

Why Texas? Because Ferrie and Beauboeuf wanted to visit an ice skating rink, and the closest one Ferrie knew of was in Houston.⁽⁶⁾

As Beauboeuf told author Gus Russo, "I was a former roller skating champion with dozens of medals. I wanted to see how good I'd do on ice. . . . We had been planning the trip for a couple of weeks."⁽⁷⁾

Researcher David Blackburst points out that Ferrie had recently received $7000 from employer G. Wray Gill and $1600 from a settlement with Eastern Air Lines, with which he was interested in starting a business with Beauboeuf. One of the businesses they were considering, in fact, was an ice-skating rink. "I had convinced Dave that ice skating was going to be the next big thing," Beauboeuf would later recall, "like disco became in the seventies." (Instead, they opened Dave & Al's service station two months later.)⁽⁸⁾

Ferrie friend Layton Martens told Gus Russo, "Ferrie had said that if [he and G. Wray Gill] won the [Marcello] case, he might be interested in purchasing a skating rink."⁽⁹⁾

Martens and Beauboeuf said the exact same thing in the Sixties, and each passed a polygraph (or "lie detector") examination about it in 1967.⁽¹⁰⁾

When Ferrie was questioned about his trip in November 1963, he made all of this perfectly clear. He told the FBI that "he had been considering for some time the feasibility and possibility of opening an ice skating rink in New Orleans." He "said he rented skates and skated at the rink for a while looking the situation over and also taking into consideration the amount of business at the rink. He stated that he introduced himself to [rink manager] Chuck Rolland and spoke with him at length concerning the cost of installation and operation of the rink."⁽¹¹⁾

Among other details of the trip, Ferrie mentioned that he and his friends had also hoped to do some hunting that weekend, and had visited a goose-hunting area near Galveston, Texas.⁽¹²⁾

Ferrie volunteered to the New Orleans District Attorney's Office both in 1963 and later to submit to a polygraph examination and to the administration of sodium Pentothal (so-called "truth serum"). On both occasions, the DA's men turned him down.⁽¹³⁾

So why does Oliver Stone show Ferrie being interrogated by Jim Garrison and stumbling all over himself?

Because when Ferrie was reinterviewed by one of the DA's staffers, John Volz, in December 1966, his memory was no longer clear on the details of the trip. Most obviously, he could no longer remember whether he had taken the trip to go ice-skating or goose-hunting. Thus he had an exchange with Volz very similar to the one depicted in JFK.⁽¹⁴⁾

For example, Ferrie stated in his 1966 interview that he and his friends had taken shotguns with them for the purpose of hunting. In JFK, Stone takes Ferrie to task for this statement, pointing out that Al Beauboeuf and Melvin Coffey had both denied the three brought any weapons.

But during Ferrie's FBI interview of November 25, 1963, with the weekend's events fresh in his mind, "Ferrie stated he did not take any firearms with him when he left his home because he thought he might go out of the state of Louisiana and he did not know what the hunting seasons were in other states and he was also concerned about transporting firearms across the state line."⁽¹⁵⁾

So by utilizing a most selective sampling of the documentary evidence, Oliver Stone elevates an innocent weekend car trip into Jim Garrison's "thread that unraveled" the John F. Kennedy assassination.

NOTES:

1. James Phelan, "Rush to Judgment in New Orleans," The Saturday Evening Post, May 6, 1967.

2. Patricia Lambert, False Witness (New York: M. Evans and Co., 1998), pp. 26, 294 fn. 9. Further information on the Martin-Garrison lawsuit (filed June 11, 1963; withdrawn June 14, 1963) comes from researcher David Blackburst.

3. FBI Interview of Jack S. Martin, Warren Commission Document No. 75, p. 309.

4. Lambert, p. 26. See also researcher David Blackburst's detailed account of the episode.

5. Gus Russo, Live by the Sword (Baltimore: Bancroft Press, 1998), p. 329.

6. See researcher David Blackburst's detailed account of the episode.

7. Russo, p. 329.

8. Russo, p. 329.

9. Russo, p. 329.

10. FBI Interview of David Ferrie, November 25, 1963, Warren Commission Document 75, pp. 285-97. Note: While this author questions the reliability of polygraph tests in exposing deception, the willingness of a subject to submit to a polygraph examination might be considered by some to be contrary to a consciousness of guilt on his or her part.

11. FBI Interview of David Ferrie, November 25, 1963, Warren Commission Document 75, pp. 285-97.

12. A. J. Weberman Web site.

13. See researcher David Blackburst's detailed account of the episode. Note: While this author questions the reliability of polygraph tests in exposing deception, the willingness of a subject to submit to a polygraph examination might be considered by some to be contrary to a consciousness of guilt on his or her part.

14. FBI interview of David Ferrie, November 25, 1963, Warren Commission Document 75, pp. 285-97; Patricia Lambert, False Witness (New York: M. Evans and Co., 1998), p. 44.

15. NODA interview with David Ferrie, December 16, 1966.

16. FBI Interview of David Ferrie, November 25, 1963, Warren Commission Document 75, pp. 285-97.